EXCESSIVE, UNAUTHORIZED & UNEARNED “COLLECTION COSTS” = ABUSIVE & PREDATORY COLLECTION PRACTICES
|12/31/11||Balance due Dec 31, 2011 was zero. See annotated Resident Transaction Report Page 1335.|
|1/1/12||$275 Jan 2012 Qtr Assessment (1/1/12-3/31/12)|
|1/31/12||$25 Late Fee Assessed. See 1/31/12 RMI Quarterly statement. Upon information and belief, the 1/31/12 statement assessments due and late fees due was the last such statement distributed to owners.|
|2/14/12||Tobin’s Check 112, dated 2/14/12, paid $275 for quarter ending 3/31/12 plus $25 late fee|
|4/1/12||$275 Assessments due for 4/1/12-6/30/12|
|4/24/12||Tobin’s Check 127, dated 4/24/12, paid for quarter ending 6/30/12, so no late fee became due on 4/30/12.|
|6/30/12||Page 1335 Resident transaction report shows assessments were current to 6/30/12.|
|7/1/12||Foreclosure deed recitals falsely claim that no payments were made after 7/1/12. See 8/22/14 annotated foreclosure deed. |
See 3/12/13 rescinded NODES,
|7/1/12||$275 Assessments due for 7/1/12-9/30/12|
|7/31/12||$25 Late fee assessed for 7/1/12-9/30/12 quarter|
|8/17/12||Tobin’s check 143, dated 8/17/12, paid $275 Assessments due for 7/1/12-9/30/12 and $25 Late fee assessed on 7/31/12, for 2763 White Sage Drive. |
See annotated Resident Transaction Report Page 1335.
|8/17/12||Tobin’s check 143, dated 8/17/12, paid $275 Assessments due for 7/1/12-9/30/12 and $25 Late fee assessed on 7/31/12, for 2664 Olivia Heights. |
See Resident Transaction Report Page 12859
|9/13/12||SCA’s managing agent RMI referred the account to its subsidiary RRFS to initiate collections per RRFS log in SCA 415, RRFS’s log of “homeowner progress”|
|9/17/12||On unsent 9/17/12 RRFS notice of intent to lien, RRFS claimed $617.94 was due when only $275 assessments and a $25 late fee were authorized for 7/1/12-9/30/12 quarter.|
See SCA 642 and SCA 643.
|9/17/12||RRFS reported to the Board that the account was a potential write off of $321.51 SCA removed the RRFS collection reports from the SCA website after Tobin downloaded them in 2018. |
See RRFS potential write off as of 9/30/12 for 2763 White Sage, RRFS account #808634
|9/20/12||SCA 628 and SCA 635 are the senders copy of certified letters, item number 71603901984964087011. |
Both sender’s copies are stamped as received by RRFS on 10/8/12. SCA/RRFS did not disclose any proofs of service for SCA 628 and SCA 635.
Tobin has no record or recollection of ever receiving it. SCA alleged in its MSJ that Tobin had sent it to RRFS with a 10/3/12 letter she sent to SCA transmitting check 143 and Hansen’s death certificate. No evidence supports this claim.
All evidence supports that RMI sent SCA 628 and SCA 635 to RRFS at which time RRFS stamped them received. The effect of this was to unfairly impose unauthorized and unnecessary collection fees on the estate of a deceased homeowner without the executor’s knowledge.
|9/20/12||SCA 628 and SCA 635 are the same notice of hearing on 10/8/12 for temporary suspension of Gordon Hansen’s privileges for the alleged violation of the governing documents of delinquent assessments. SCA may have sent this notice. However, Tobin did not receive it. There never was a hearing on 10/10/12. Tobin’s check 143, dated 8/17/12, paid assessments through 9/30/12 are rendered it moot.|
|9/30/12||$275 Assessments due for 7/1/12 – 9/30/12 quarter plus $25 late fee assessed on 7/31/12 were paid by $300 check 143|
|9/30/12||In SCA 618, RRFS Allocation detail shows that check 143 was applied to pay the assessments and late fees due and payable through 9/30/12.|
|9/30/12||Check 143 paid the account in full for the quarter 7/1/12-9/30/12. See SCA 618 which shows|
|9/30/12||9/30/12 RRFS reported to the SCA Board that as of 9/30/12, account 808634 was a potential write off of $351.21.|
See RRFS potential write off as of 9/30/12 for 2763 White Sage, RRFS account #808634
|10/1/12||$275 Assessments due for quarter 10/1/12-12/31/12|
|10/3/12||Per SCA 631, Tobin gave notice to SCA that the owner had died. Enclosed were |
1) 1/14/12 death certificate and
2) “Check for $300 HOA dues”
Tobin’s notice was sent to the HOA. She indicated the late payment of the deceased owner’s assessments was an error, that the property was in escrow,
that the prospective purchasers were moving in shortly,
that further payments would be made out of escrow, and
that the HOA should work with Doug/Proudfit Realty or new owners to collect future assessments. SCA’s claims that Tobin acted in bad faith, had “unclean hands” and that she was “barred by equitable principles from recovering” for not knowing or remembering that check 143 was not delivered on 8/17/12 when it was written.
Tobin had no recollection of writing the 10/3/12 letter and only became aware of it on 12/26/18 when PDFs of documents disclosed by SCA on 5/31/18 as a picture of a CD, were given to her by attorney Joe Coppedge.
|10/3/12||Page 1335 Resident Transaction Report does not have an entry to acknowledge that check 143 for $300 was submitted to pay the assessments for the quarter from 7/1/12 – 9/30/12 as was reported in SCA 618..|
|10/8/12||RRFS stamped on a paper with a picture of check 143 as received by RRFS on 10/8/12. |
There is no date stamp on check 143 to indicate when SCA received it or when RRFS received it.
It is more probable, given the many alterations/ misrepresentations of other documents RRFS/SCA disclosed, that Tobin’s recollection that she submitted check 143 with check 142 on 8/17/12 was correct. and RRFS altered the date on the transmittal letter from 8/17/12 to 10/3/12 to conceal that FSR forwarding the account to collections on 9/13/12 was an error.
|10/8/12||SCA 628 and SCA 635 both are SCA compliance letters, dated 9/20/12, to Gordon Hansen, at 2664 Olivia Heights. SCA/RRFS did not disclose any proofs of service for SCA 628 and SCA 635. Tobin has no record or recollection of ever receiving it. SCA/RRFS did not disclose any letter to 2763 White Sage which would have been required it this was supposed to be the first step of the due process required before imposing a penalty on the homeowner for delinquent assessments.|
|10/10/12||The 10/10/12 hearing noticed allegedly by 9/20/12 letter in SCA 628 and SCA 635 did not occur. No notice of sanction followed it equivalent to the 8/13/14 Notice of Fines Tobin received after a hearing was held to give notice of a $25 fine for dead plants.|
|10/18/12||RRFS ledger did not apply check 143 to pay the 7/1/12-9/30/12 quarter. On 10/18/12 RRFS ledger entered that check 143 left a balance $369.15 instead of the $275 that was actually due and payable for the quarter of 10/1/12-12/31/12|
|10/18/12||SCA 618 PAY ALLOCATION shows check 143 was both allocated as payment of the quarter 7/1/12-9/30/12 or was a partial payment that left a balance as of 10/18/12 comprised of all RRFS-added charges.|
|10/18/12||RRFS ledger SCA 623-625 called check 143 a partial payment|
|10/31/12||$25 late fee for 10/1/12-12/31/12 delinquent installment was assessed. As of 10/31/12, amount due and owing was $300.|
|10/31/12||Balance due on 10/31/12 as listed in SCA resident transaction report instead of the $275 assessments and $25 late fee actually authorized and due and payable as of 10/31/12.|
|10/31/12||On 11/5/12 RRFS ledgeer sent to 2763 White Sage and forwarded by Proudfit Realty to Ticor Title claimed $495.36 was due when $300 would have paid through 12/31/12 the $300 assessment and late fee authorized for the quarter 10/1/12-12/31/12|
|10/31/12||RRFS reported to the Board that account 808634, 2763 White Sage Dr. was a potential write off of $382.26 as of 10/31/12|
|11/1/12||SCA Board published a schedule of fees that conformed to the NRS 116.310313(2) limits set by the CIC Commission except for the sentence “Fees and costs may change without notice. Schedule of fees may not be all inclusive.”|
|11/5/12||SCA 620 11/5/12 “Correspondence Response Sent to Homeowner” “(RRFS) is in receipt of the correspondence that the homeowner has passed away. Our records have been updated…” RRFS claimed $495.36 was due as of 10/31/12 instead of the $300 actually due.|
|11/9/12||Per 11/9/12 into SCA resident transaction report after a $300 collection payment was credited from check 143, there was a $351.21 balance reported on Page 1335 because two unauthorized monthly late fees had been added. $300 was due, $275 for assessments for the 10/1/12-12/31/12 quarter plus the $25 late fee due on 10/31/12.)|
|11/9/12||Page 1335 Resident Transaction Report has an entry, dated 11/9/13, that shows the HOA received a collection payment of $300 on 11/6/12.|
|11/9/12||SCA 617 “Payment Allocation 11/9/12” information as of 10/18/12. Check 143 for $300 was received as a “partial payment”. “Association Allocation detai”l: $300 check was allocated to $275 assessments due 7/1/12.and 7/31/12 to $25 late fee assessed..|
|12/5/12||On 12/14/12, RRFS recorded a lien the falsely stated $925.76 was due and payable. RRFS recited on the lien that the HOA had verified that $925.76 was due and payable as of 12/5/12. As of 12/5/12, $275 for assessments for the 10/1/12-12/31/12 quarter were delinquent and a $25 late fee was authorized t be imposed on 10/31/12. All other charges were unnecessary as the account should have not been sent to collections when the only delinquent assessments were for a quarter that had not even ended. Once check 143 was paid, the account should have been removed from collections. Once the HOA received notice that future assessments would be paid out of escrow, adding $625.76 in collection fees over what was due and payable was predatory and unfair.|
|12/20/12||On 12/2012, Ticor Title requested payoff figures from RRFS to be paid out of Sparkman 8/10/12 escrow|
|1/1/13||Balance due per FSR on SCA resident transaction report to bring account current to 3/31/13|
|1/1/13||According to the HOA Resident Transaction Report, on 1/1/13, there was an outstanding balance of $677.31. This is a variance of $102.31 over what was due and payable on 1/1/13, i.e, $275 assessments for 10/1/12-12/31/12 + $25 late fee plus $275 for 1/1/13-3/31/13 quarter. Note that $575 was due. RMI, as SCA’s managing agent, recorded in SCA’s oficial accounting records that $677.31 was due. RMI d/b/a RRFS, SCA’s debt collector, demanded $1,355.60 from the deceased owner’s estate. RMI d/b/a RRFS, SCA’s debt collector, demanded $1,451.75 from the prospective purchasers’ escrow.|
|1/1/13||On 1/1/13, $275 assessments came due for quarter 1/1/13-3/31/13. There was a $300 ourstanding balance for the 10/1/12-12/31/12 quarter that resulted in a $575 balance due and payable.|
|1/3/13||RRFS sent a notice, dated 1/3/13, the GBH Hansen estate that a lien had been recorded on 12/14/12 for $976.25, but that on 1/3/13 $1355.60 was then due. The $925.76 l12/14/12 lien overstated the amount due by $625.76. The claim that $1355.60 was due on 1//3/13 overstated the amount actually due and owing by $780.60.|
|1/3/13||1/3/13 SCA 587 LIEN SENT TO OWNER|
|1/3/13||1/3/13 SCA 587 “LIEN SENT TO OWNER”|
|1/9/13||1/9/13 SCA P/O DEMAND RECEIVED1/16/13 SCA 578 P/O DEMAND SENT|
|1/16/13||On 1/16/13, RRFS responded to Ticor Title’s request for updated payoff figures with a pay off demand to the Sparkman escrow of $1451.75. This demand overstated the amount actually due and payable on 1/16/13 by $876.75.|
|1/31/13||$25 late fee due for the 1/1/13-3/31/13 quarter.|
|1/31/13||RRFS reported to the Board that account 808634, 2763 White Sage Dr. was a potential write off of $677.31 as of 1/31/13.|
|3/7/13||$702.31 amount required to pay assessments, late fees, and interest to bring balance to zero through 3/31/13 per SCA resident transaction report Page 1335|
|3/7/13||$2,475.35 was due and payable as of 3/7/13 per RRFS on 3/12/13 NODES|
|3/12/13||RRFS claimed on the rescinded 3/12/13 (NODES) Notice of Default and election to Sell that, as of 3/7/13, $2,475.35 was due, not the $702.31 reported on the SCA resident transaction report Page 1335|
|3/27/13||Effective 3/27/13, RRFS rescinded the 3/12/13 notice of default.|
|4/1/13||$275 Assessments due for quarter 4/1/13-6/30/13|
|4/3/13||SCA 553 RRFS on 4/3/13 recorded the rescission of the 3/12/13 NODES. No notice of the rescission was mailed to the owner or to the property.|
|4/4/13||As of 4/4/13, $2752.66 Due and payable per RRFS on the recorded 4/8/13 NODES vs. $825 assessments ($275 x 3 quarters from 10/1/12-6/30/13) and $50 for late fees ($25 for the 4/1/13-6/30/13 quarter was not due until the for the 4/1/13-6/30/13 quarterly installment was 30 days past due on 4/30/13.|
|4/16/13||SCA 525 4/16/13 “Payoff Demand Received”.|
See SCA 415-416 for RRFS work log entries related to RRFS refusal of Miles Bauer tender.
|4/17/13||SCA 527 4/17/13 Request reviewed|
|4/30/13||$25 late fee was assessed for 4/1/13-6/30/13 delinquent installment|
|4/30/13||SCA 254 RRFS acct detail 4/4/13 – 12/31/13 shows RRFS charged the Hansen account $150 to respond to Miles Bauer request for pay off figures|
|4/30/13||SCA 517 -519 4/30/13 “Payoff Demand Sent” RRFS letter to Miles Bauer stated that as of 4/30/13, $$2,904.26 was due.|
|5/7/13||Tobin faxed a letter to put BANA on notice of her intent to stop paying to protect the security interest of a lender to whom she did not owe any debt.|
See Tobin 5/7/13 letter to BANA and attachments disclosed as NSM 274-328.
|5/8/13||SCA 513 Miles Bauer check for $825, the exact amount of assessments then delinquent. |
See SCA 513-530 for RRFS disclosures re rejection of the first super-priority tender. (SCA 302 was the second.)
|5/16/13||5/16/13 SCA 512 is a request for payoff figures from Proudfit Realty “We are expecting a short-sale approval letter to be issued in the name of the new buyers. Escrow is expected to close no later than June 28, 2013.”|
See SCA 504-512.
|5/29/13||RRFS responded on 5/29/13 that $3,055.47 was due and payable instead of the $825 assessments and $75 late fees that were due and owing to bring the account paid in full to 6/30/13.|
|5/29/13||SCA 254 RRFS acct detail 4/4/13 – 12/31/13 shows that on 5/29/13 RRFS charged $150 for pay off demand in relation to Proudfit Realty request for pay off figures in Mazzeo’s escrow opened on 5/10/13 for a $395,000 purchase offer|
|6/30/13||If Miles Baur tender of $875 had been accepted and correctly applied, assessments would have been paid through 6/30/13. There were unpaid late fees for the three quarters then delinquent ($25 x 3= $75 due for the quarters from 10/1/12-6/30/13). |
It was unfair for Miles Bauer to tender the $825 for the nine months then delinquent after its principal, servicing bank BANA, refused to let the escrow (8/10/12-4/8/13) close on Sparkman’s FMV arms-length offer.
Ticor Title had been instructed to pay the $1,451.75 RRFS had demanded on 1/16/13 on COE.
It was also unfair that BANA’s agent Miles Bauer tendered the $825 super-priority directly to RRFS without notifying Ticor Title, Proudfit or Tobin.
RRFS did not notify the SCA Board, or more importantly, request Board approval, of its rejection of the tender of 100% of the assessments then delinquent.
|Per RTR pages 1334-1336 the amount due and owing as of 6/30/13 was $1,083.14.|
|7/1/13||Per RTR pages 1334-1336 the amount due and owing as of 7/1/13 was $1,308.14|
|7/1/13||$275 Assessments due for 7/1/13-9/30/13|
|7/1/13||$825 delinquent through 6/30/13 +$275 assessments due for 7/1/13-9/30/13 quarter equated to $1100, one year of assessments due because of RRFS’s unilateral rejection of the Miles Bauer tender and because of BANA’s unilateral rejection of the Mazzeo’s 5/10/13 $395,000 offer.|
|7/10/13||Tobin removed the property from the market, turned off the electricity, and initiated a deed in lieu process with BANA.|
See Tobin’s 2013 deed in lieu handwritten notes.
|7/31/13||$25 late fee due bringing to $1100 the assessments that were delinquent plus$100 in late fees that were authorized=$1,200.|
|8/15/13||SCA 401 is an envelope addressed to 2763 White Sage that was stamped on 8/15/13 “deceased”. There is no such envelope for the letter RRFS alleged in SCA 287 was sent to 2763 White Sage on 7/2/14. This is the 7/2/14 letter that RRFS claims was sent to notify the owner that the waiver request RRFS sent to the SCA Board on 6/9/14 was denied. |
See SCA 401-403 Return to Senders
|8/15/13||SCA 403 is an envelope addressed to 2763 White Sage that was stamped on 8/15/13 “Return to sender Not deliverable as addressed. Unable to forward.”. There is no such envelope for the letter RRFS alleged in SCA 287 was sent to 2763 White Sage on 7/2/14. This is the 7/2/14 letter that RRFS claims was sent to notify the owner that the waiver request RRFS sent to the SCA Board on 6/9/14 was denied.|
|10/1/13||Balance due per FSR on SCA resident transaction report to bring account current to 12/31/13|
|10/1/13||Balance per RRFS account detail in SCA 254|
|10/1/13||Assessments due for 10 /1/13-12/31/13|
|10/16/13||10/16/13 SCA 450 Followed Up POP|
|10/16/13||SCA 468 RRFS “Homeowner Progress Report” to 10/16/13 does not show any BOD approval|
|10/31/13||$25 late fee due|
|1/1/14||Balance due per FSR on SCA resident transaction report to bring account current to 3/31/14|
|1/1/14||Balance per RRFS account detail in SCA 254|
|1/1/14||Assessments due for 1/1/14-3/31/14|
|1/31/14||$25 late fee due|
|2/11/14||Effective 2/11/14, RRFS claimed that $5,081.45 was due and payable on the Notice of Sale published on 2/12/14 (cancelled on 5/15/14 and not replaced). |
Note that RRFS did not ever update the 2/11/14 $5,081.45 figure a a second published NOS.
RRFS concealed its 3/28/14 payoff demand to Chicago Title in which RRFS stated that as of 3/28/14 $4,962.24 was due as of 3/28/14. The discrepancy ($5,081.45 on 2/11/14 vs. $4,962.24 on 3/28/14 is explained on page 6 of the 3/28/14 demand.
RRFS and SCA obfuscated that on 3/28/14 the SCA BOD instructed RRFS to reduce $400 in late fees and $18.81 in interest of the $5,083.45 RRFS claimed was due on 2/11/14.) Note that SCA 275-SCA 315 includes significant alterations of the RRFS accounts and records to obfuscate this action by the SCA BOD and to misrepresent the 5/28/14 NSM offer (one year assessments ($1100) to close the MZK 5/8/14 auction.com sale) as a fee waiver request from the owner. Further, SCA 254, RRFS’s 8/15/14 Account Detail fails to accurately account for the 3/28/14 fee and interest waiver authorized by the SCA BOD.
|2/12/14||Published 2/12/14 Notice of Sale (NOS) alleged that $5,081.45 was due as of 2/11/14.|
|2/28/14||$4,962.64 RRFS response to payoff demand requested by Chicago Title|
|3/18/14||3/18/14 payoff demand received|
|3/18/14||SCA 312 -313 shows that Chicago Title requested pay off figures from RRFS.|
|3/18/14||SCA 310 contains two emails dated 3/18/14 which clearly indicate RRFS received a request for payoff figure on 3/18/14, but the SCA BOD was scheduled to review Leidy’s requests at the 3/27/14 meeting. Note RRFS and SCA both failed to disclose the 3/28/14 RRFS response to Chicago title in which the ledger shows that the SCA BOD approved a $400 fee waiver. This fee waiver is not included in SCA 255, RRFS account detail from 2/11/14-8/15/14|
|3/28/14||On 3/28/14 RRFS demanded $3,055.47 was due in response to Chicago Title’s 3/18/14 request for pay off figures found in SCA 312 -313. RRFS, NSM, and SCA concealed RRFS’s 3/28/14 demand. On 10/14/14, Leidy provided it to Tobin. Leidy informed Tobin on 10/14/14 that it was the only ledger he had ever received.|
|3/28/14||RRFS concealed payoff demand of $3,055.47 in response to Chicago Title (concealed in discovery)|
|3/28/14||$4,687.64 was shown as due and payable on|
|3/28/14||See Page 6 of the 3/28/14 RRFS ledger concealed from discovery by RRFS, SCA, BHHS, and NSM. |
3/28/14 Page 6 shows a $400 fee reduction was approved by the SCA board pursuant to Leidy’s 3/7/14 only fee reduction request found buried in SCA .
6/9/14 Page 6 of RRFS 6/9/14 ledger scrubs the $400 Board approved reduction and reports that RRFS billed no collection costs from 2/11/14 to 5/30/14 (See SCA 301).
A further accounting discrepancy in found in SCA 250
|4/1/14||Balance due per FSR on SCA resident transaction report to bring account current to 6/30/14|
|4/1/14||$275 Assessments due for 4/1/14-6/30/14|
|4/30/14||$25 late fee due for delinquent 4/1/14-6/30/14 installment|
|4/30/14||SCA 254 RRFS acct detail 4/4/13 – 12/31/13 shows on 4/30/13 RRFS claimed $2,876.95 was due as of 4/30/13 in response to Miles Bauer’s request for pay off figures. SCA 254. On|
|5/15/14||No BOD approval of postponed 5/15/14 sale date|
|5/15/14||SCA 307 is an unsigned approval form to conduct the sale on 5/15/14. |
No signed BOD approval was disclosed in SCA 176-643 or exists in the 4/26/14 minutes of Board approval to conduct the sale on 5/15/14.
On 5/15/14, the Ombudsman received notice that the 5/15/14 sale was cancelled as the owner was retained.
|5/15/14||SCA 308 is another email alleging final approval of the 5/15/14 sale from which the date has been scrubbed and there is no signature|
|5/28/14||SCA 302 NSM 5/28/14 super-priority offer|
|6/2/14||Ombudsman employee, Ann Moore, logged that the Ombudsman had received notice that the 5/15/14 sale date had been cancelled, the 2/12/14 notice of sale process and the “trustee sale: were cancelled and the “owner retained”. See authenticated Ombudsman Notice of Sale Compliance Record (OMB-NOS)|
|7/1/14||Balance due per FSR on SCA resident transaction report Page 1336 to bring account current to 9/30/14 was $2,692.68.|
See Resident Transaction report, Pages 1334-1336
|7/1/14||Assessments due for 7/1/14-6/30/14|
|7/2/14||SCA 277 Undated email RRFS to Leidy “Please see response regarding the settlement request for $1000.00” (Note there was no settlement request for $1000. Leidy did not receive this. Not clear what was supposedly attached as it does not relate to the 6/5/14 email Leidy sent to RRFS to forward the NSM 5/28/14 offer that is on the bottom of the page SCA 277|
|7/2/14||unsent RRFS ledger falsely alleged to have been sent to 2664 OH and 2763 WS|
|7/31/14||$25 late fee due.|
|7/31/14||Per RTR pages 1334-1336 the amount due and owing on 7/31/14 $2,692/68.|
|8/13/14||Notice of Fines was sent after a hearing was held prior to the imposition of a $25 fine for a dead tree at 2763 White Sage|
|8/15/14||RRFS sold 2763 White Sage without notice to any party with a known interest.|
|8/15/14||SCA 255 2/11/14 – 8/15/14 RRFS account detail does not have an entry of 3/28/14 SCA BOD $400 fee waiver and does not include any charges for the 3/28/14 pay off demand to Chicago Title and does not report SCA 302, NSM’s 5/28/14 super-priority tender. It also shows RRFS was charging late fees monthly when payments were in quarterly installments and $25 per installment was authorized.|
|8/27/14||Collection payment entered to pay Gordon Hansen’s account in full|
|9/25/14||Page 1337 Resident Transaction Report shows an entry on 9/25/14 that Jimijack Irr Tr paid $225.00 new owner setup fee. Jimijack’s Resident ID was 0480-02. SCA’s ownership record shows Jimijack was the second owner of the property.|
|9/25/14||Page 1337 Resident Transaction Report 9/25/14-3/31/16 and SCA owner record 4/1/16-5/9/16 shows Jimijack was the only owner after Hansen. SCA refused to provide the SCA ownership records requested from 8/15/14 date of the sale to 2/28/19 end of discovery.|
|4/1/16||2763 White Sage payments for all owners 1/1/06-5/9/16|
|10/8/12 Upon information and belief, RMI, SCA’s managing agent, forwarded check 143 to RRFS instead of crediting it on the resident transaction report and stamping it “received” in the same manner as it processed check 142. See checks 142 and 143. See RTR Page 1335, entry dated 11/9/12. See RTR page 12859, entry dated 8/17/12.|